As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) in the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Case legislation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. As an example, a ruling in a very California appellate court would not normally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally regarded conviction. Read more
The official court record is maintained because of the court of record. Copies of case file documents usually are not out there within the search site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
However it truly is made clear that police is free to get action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to law. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure respect from the family shed in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been obtained. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated above. Read more
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons getting their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It's also a well-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is often a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law needs that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The website law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Any court may perhaps search for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different conclusion. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment into a higher court.
eight. With the reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Therefore acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Criminal cases While in the common law tradition, courts decide the law applicable to the case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil law systems, common regulation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.